Overdose On Citalopram

Chaos Organization and End of Organizational

The organization viewed as SYSTEM

A system is a network of interdependent components that work together for a purpose (literal translation W. Edwards Deming)
System
So, in a defined area, consists of:
- components, or subsystems members
- Common Purpose

- Interrelationships among its members, departments, people ....
- Frontier system with its environment (subjective depending on the limit of our study)

A living being is a good example of the system. Components organs, cells. Their common purpose: to survive.

An orchestra is another great example of a system. Its members are musicians and their director, the purpose is the piece that has to please his audience. If all musicians want to be actors lack the proper harmony that is achieved with the cooperation of all coordinated by its director.

A business organization is a system must have a clear purpose and clear, known by all its members . As the orchestra common purpose should prevail over individual virtuosity.

Unlike a flow chart only shows the hierarchy of an organization, the assessment of an organization as a real system the interrelationship among all its parts and its border. The effect of some components in the other.

A system should be directed, managed, left unaddressed, real in the Western world, members of an enterprise system become selfish, independent, competitive. Managed the system itself is aimed at the destruction.

direct, manage organizational system involves:

- knowledge to understand the interplay between all components.
- promote cooperation to achieve the purpose of system, ensuring that all individual efforts are aligned with the purpose of the system.
- Clarify the purpose all components and specific contribution to it.

If the address of the organizational system could not ensure that the efforts of all members of the system is directed to achieving the common purpose, if it fails to prevent domestic competitiveness members depart to common purpose, will have planted the seeds of destruction of the system.

The scope of the system should include all parties affected by its existence depending on the design, management, departments, employees, unions, shareholders, partners, customers, suppliers ,....

Management should be prepared to redefine and expand the area, including collaborations with industry associations, research centers, government and more.

The common purpose of the system:

- The purpose is a single decision be delegated to senior management . In fact, the business purpose precedes the organization. How could if employees choose not suitable?
- The purpose should include the future of . Do not leave the fate of the system at random. This involves training components and leaders but also keep under review the changing environment.
- Only the best results are achieved if the purpose of ensuring that its achievement everyone wins.
- A system must create something of value, results.

Systems Thinking (PS)

"A system is an entity that owes its existence to the mutual interaction of its parts" - General Systems Theory "by Ludwig von Bertalanffy

Thinking in terms of system," Systems Thinking "or" PS: Systemic thinking allows us to better understand the world around us through the interrelations of its components and therefore have better control of it. PS

A model of reality in these terms will give us an approximation of it to help determine the effect on all of our actions in some or some of its parts. But a model is always different from reality, only an approximation.

With PS any decision to change can be analyzed as a whole and consider the possible side effects . Although the experiments only allow us to confirm the degree of success, reduce uncertainty, reduce risk.

generation system

A system is a living entity: it is born, grows and evolves. You can also die. A company was born with an idea, a purpose.

Idea (Purpose) ==> System Plan ==> Members ==> Results ==> Repeat
permanent improvement of the circuit.

Percent Of People That Speak English In Shanghai

The paradigm of measurable things

Do our leaders what they want?

In business organizations, value things only be translated into numbers, the other not. If we assume that many of the most important things are not measurable, then companies have a serious appreciation of reality and value of things. I would add that it is measurable only the past, the future is unknown, but perhaps predictable. It

gives value only to what is measurable, when the most important, often by unknown, is where there is more scope for optimization and performance.

Thus the quality of life is not measurable, even if what we all want. Instead it is measurable economic level in terms of income or possessions. We just forward the economic level, because it is measurable. The quality of life ceases to be a value and is usually sacrificed in favor of measurable level.

Similarly, managers who do not know how to measure what they want for their organizations, they end up wanting what they can measure . We do not value what we want, but what we can measure. Sometimes because other do too. Move the real priorities of other important secondary because they are not translatable into numbers. If they are not translatable into numbers can not appear in a presentation to the next level. If they are not translatable to understand numbers, go into the details and have the knowledge to do so.

An example is training. Many companies measure training hours, the amount of people going to classes, etc.. To be measured becomes the desirable goal. But what he initially wanted was something else. Really important is not the hours nor the percentage of employees who have attended, it really is important is to train people for jobs that have or have to do. Is it measurable?: Not easily, but is much more important to know the individual challenges and solutions to the large statistics that say nothing. Unless the company will invest in training, little or nothing these numbers tell us whether the training is useful.

not value, because it is not measurable, effective learning that people obtain through other means such as cooperation and help received from colleagues and superiors or self-study. However encouraging this cooperation must come from management. Similarly

often wrongly immeasurable value quality products and services for the price. A high price high quality. This is sometimes simply wrong. The price is simply proportional to the cost of production and added benefit. The producer price has included the cost of organizational inefficiency. Do we make mistakes sometimes when you buy the more expensive product? Yes

Nowadays a professional who does his work without errors can go unnoticed. The non-errors are not measured. At contrary, if you leave you see a fire and extinguishes it, will be assessed by measuring the salved. "We encourage bad practices?. I think so.

Similarly, some economists are rated as important to the cost of labor that destroys value, because can be measured. We have the paradox that while the GDP of a country increases with the war, poor life quality.

We must change the model, we must change the method of valuation of things, we must ensure that the purpose of organizations is not lost on topics measurable.

Once again, we must refocus our management style and know what is really important. Our managers must provide leadership by sharing and knowing the detail of things to help improve them, and not focus exclusively on what can be shown on a powerpoint.